Low LDL-C level and intracranial haemorrhage risk after ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study
First author:Jie Xu,Zimo Chen
Corresponding author:Yongjun Wang
2022-09-26
Journal:Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Publication type: Original Contributions
IF(IF): 9.893
PMID: 36162902 Link To Pubmed Full text Download
Currently, the “post-statin” era has came and the emerge of combined therapy of “statin+ezetimibe”, “statin+PCSK-9” and “statin+ezetimibe+PCSK-9” have called on the need of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy. However, concerns still exist about the hemorrhagic risk brought by reduction of LDL-c. Moreover, according to the 2017 announced AACE and ACE guideline and the updated ESC/EAS guidelines for lipid management stated, there is no lower limit for LDL-c reduction above 1.0 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), which begun a new era for lipid-lowering therapy and supported the mantra of “lower is better” for LDL-c reduction. For patients with ischemic stroke, one of the major population for lipid-lowering therapy, evidence still remains limited on the correlation between low level of LDL-c and hemorrhagic risk, especially for the data of real world with large sample size. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the low level of LDL-c may increase the risk of hemorrhagic events including hemorrhagic transformation and hemorrhagic stroke, among ischemic stroke patients during hospitalization.
Patients who had an IS from China Stroke Center Alliance programme with complete baseline information were prospectively enrolled. 793 572 patients who had an IS were categorised into 6 groups according to LDL-C level (<1.40mmol/L, 1.40–1.79mmol/L, 1.80–2.59mmol/L, 2.60–2.99mmol/L, 3.00–4.89mmol/L, ≥4.90mmol/L). The study outcome was defined as intracranial haemorrhage identified during hospitalisation. Logistic regression model was used to examine the association between different LDL-C levels and risk of intracranial haemorrhage.
Among patients who had an IS, the low LDL-C level (<1.4mmol/L or <1.8mmol/L) at baseline is associated with increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage during acute stage. While actively lowering LDL-C level for patients who had an IS, clinicians should also concern about the haemorrhagic risk associated with low LDL-C level.
Compared with patients of LDL-C=1.80–2.59mmol/L, both subgroups of LDL-C<1.40mmol/L and LDL-C=1.40–1.79mmol/L showed significantly higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.35; OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.14 to 1.30, respectively). Interaction effect was found to exist between the subgroups of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p=0.04), rather than the subgroups of age, sex and body mass index. Moreover, the sensitivity analyses indicated that even patients who had an IS with minor stroke still suffered from the increased intracranial haemorrhage risk related to low LDL-C level.