Data Management And Sharing System of China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases

Distinctive epileptogenic networks for parietal operculum seizures

First author:Wang Haixiang

Corresponding author:Wang Qun

Brain networks; Epileptogenicity map; Parietal epi

essential_information

  • Person in charge:Wang Haixiang
  • Data Sources: OTHERS
  • Number of papers:OTHERS20190841
  • Published time:2019-02-01

2019-02-01

Published articles

Journal:Epilepsy & Behavior

Publication type: Research Article

IF(IF): 2.937

PMID: 30269938 Link To Pubmed Full text Download

Background And Purpose

Method

Comprehensive presurgical evaluation data of seven patients with drug-resistant epilepsy with POS were analyzed retrospectively. Stereoelectroencephalography-recorded seizures were processed visually and quantitatively by using epileptogenicity mapping (EM), which has been proposed to ergonomically quantify the epileptogenicity of brain structures with a neuroimaging approach.

Conclusion

This study indicated that POS could be characterized by initial specific somatosensory sensations, followed by either frequently nocturnal hypermotor seizures or contralateral focal motor seizures. The distinctive seizure semiology depended on the organization of two primary epileptogenic networks. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond.

Main results

Six patients reported initial somatosensory or viscerosensitive symptoms. Ictal clinical signs comprised frequently nocturnal hypermotor seizures and contralateral focal motor seizures, including tonic, tonic-clonic, or dystonic seizures of the face and limbs. Interictal and ictal scalp EEG provided information regarding lateralization in the majority of patients, but the discharges were widely distributed over perisylvian or "rolandic-like" regions and the vertex. Furthermore, two subgroups of epileptogenic network organization were identified within POS by SEEG, visually and quantitatively, using an EM approach: group 1 (mesial frontal/cingulate networks) was observed in three patients who mainly exhibited hypermotor seizures; group 2 (perisylvian networks) was observed in four patients who mainly exhibited contralateral focal motor seizures.