国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心数据管理与共享系统

Data Management And Sharing System of China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases

Differences in characteristics and outcomes after endovascular therapy: A single-center analysis of patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease and embolism

第一作者:Zhang Xuelei

通讯作者:Miao Zhongrong

Endovascular therapy intracranial atherosclerotic

基本信息

  • 负责人:Zhang Xuelei
  • 数据来源: OTHERS
  • 论文编号:OTHERS20190881
  • 发表时间:2019-06-01

2019-06-01

已发表文章

发表杂志:Interv Neuroradiol

发表类型: Original Contributions

影响因子(IF): 1.61

PMID: 30514143 Pubmed原文链接 全文下载

主要研究背景及目的

方法

Patients with VBAO who received endovascular therapy (EVT) were retrospectively analyzed. Participants fulfilling the criteria were classified as the ICAD group (focal stenosis of >70%, or fixed stenosis >50% in addition to either flow and perfusion impairment on angiography or an evident reocclusion tendency) and the embolism group (defined as no evidence of focal significant stenosis after thrombolysis or thrombectomy). Baseline characteristics and outcomes after EVT were compared between the two groups, and logistic regression was performed to explore the factors associated with ICAD.

结论

The occlusion sites and a history of atrial fibrillation might be helpful in predicting ICAD in patients with VBAO. Patients with ICAD who were treated by EVT had a lower rate of recanalization but comparable 90-day good outcomes.

主要结果

Among the 133 patients enrolled, 95 (71.4%) patients were categorized in the ICAD group, and 38 (28.6%) in the embolism group. A history of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio (OR) 0.142; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.028-0.707), p = 0.017), distal basilar artery occlusion (OR 0.107; 95% CI (0.040-0.289), p < 0.001) and V4 segment occlusion (OR 3.423; 95% CI (1.172-9.999), p = 0.024) were independently associated with ICAD. Patients with VBAO due to ICAD had a lower rate of recanalization (81.1% vs 100%, p = 0.004), but the 90-day good clinical outcome was comparable (41.1% vs 50.0%, p = 0.347).