Data Management And Sharing System of China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases

Elevated lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 are associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke

First author:Xue Jiang

Corresponding author:Yongjun Wang; Lemin Zheng

Lipoprotein(a) Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Inflammation Functional Outcomes Ischemic Stroke

essential_information

  • Person in charge:Xue Jiang
  • Data Sources: CNSR-Ⅲ
  • Number of papers:CNSR-Ⅲ20210226
  • Published time:2021-12-28

2021-12-28

Published articles

Journal: Journal of Neuroinflammation

Publication type: Article

IF(IF): 8.322

PMID: 34963487 Link To Pubmed Full text Download

Background And Purpose

The association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and stroke functional outcomes was conflicting. The aim of the study was to clarify whether high Lp(a) is associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke

Method

A total of 9709 individuals from the third China National Stroke Registry cohort were recruited. Plasma level of Lp(a) at admission was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The cut-off was set at the median for Lp(a). Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke. The association between Lp(a) and functional outcomes was evaluated using a logistic regression model.

Conclusion

Elevated Lp(a) level is associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. The increment in both Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 are associated with unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke.

Main results

The median age was 63.0 years, and 31.1% participants were women. Patients in higher Lp(a) group had higher incidences of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months. In logistic regression model, elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (Q4 vs. Q1: odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.61). Subgroup analysis showed that in the lower Lp-PLA2 group, Lp(a) level was not associated with functional outcomes, but in the higher Lp-PLA2 group, Lp(a) level was significantly associated with functional outcomes. After grouped by different levels of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2, the Lp(a) high/ Lp-PLA2 high group showed the highest incidence of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year