国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心数据管理与共享系统

Data Management And Sharing System of China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases

Low-dose rt-PA may not decrease the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with high risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage

第一作者:Mingyong Liu

通讯作者:Yongjun Wang,Lichun Zhou

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator acute isc

基本信息

  • 负责人:Mingyong Liu
  • 数据来源: TIMS-CHINA
  • 论文编号:TIMS-CHINA20190224
  • 发表时间:2019-03-01

2019-03-01

已发表文章

发表杂志:Neurological Research

发表类型: Original Contributions

影响因子(IF): 2.448

PMID: 30822264 Pubmed原文链接 全文下载

主要研究背景及目的

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been used as the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The following study investigates whether lowdose rt-PA can decrease the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) in AIS patients with high-risk sICH compared to standard-dose rt-PA.

方法

Data from the Thrombolysis Implementation and Monitor of Acute Ischemic Stroke in China (TIMS-China) studies were assessed to explore risk factors for sICH after intravenous thrombolysis. For high-risk sICH patients (age ≧70 years old, or with diabetes, or serum glucose on admission >9.0 mmol/L, or NIHSS on admission>20, or with cardioembolism), standard-dose rt-PA (0.85 to 0.95 mg/kg) and low- dose rt-PA (0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg) were compared. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of sICH, and the secondary outcome measures were 7-day mortality and 90-day functional independence outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0–2).

结论

Our study suggests that low-dose intravenous rt-PA for high-risk sICH stroke in Chinese patients may not decrease the incidence of sICH, and concomitant with a poor outcome compared to standard-dose rt-PA.

主要结果

A total of 554 patients were enrolled (60 cases for low dose, and 494 cases for standard dose). Median rt-PA doses were 0.63 and 0.90 mg, respectively. After adjustment for the baseline variables, low-dose rt-PA did not decrease the incidence of sICH (per SITS-MOST criteria, 3.33% versus 2.23%, P = 0.3467) compared to low dose. The low-dose group revealed less functional independence outcomes (modified Rankin scale, 0–2) compared to standarddose group (36.67% versus 52.43%; odds ratio = 0.49; p = 0.0204) at 90 days.