Data Management And Sharing System of China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases
essential_information
2015-06-01
Published articles
Journal：Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Publication type: Research
IF(IF): 1.876
PMID: 25817570 Link To Pubmed Full text Download
Background And Purpose
Method
We analyzed data from the two cohorts: a multicenter prospective poor-grade aSAH registry study (AMPAS); and the National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (NCRC-ND) database of poor-grade patients. Outcome was assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and was dichotomized into favorable (mRS 0-3) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-6). We compared major complication rates, mortality and outcomes between primary DC and control groups.
Conclusion
Although primary DC does not increase postoperative complication and mortality risk, current results showed primary DC does not seem to be significantly associated with improved outcomes. However, more than one half of patients most benefit from primary DC. Further prospective controlled studies are warranted to clarify the issue.
Main results
Twenty-four patients with primary DC were included in the study group. Fourteen patients without DC were included in the control group. Patients with younger age and lower Glasgow coma score (GCS) more often underwent primary DC. Major complications did not differ between the two groups. Fourteen (58%) patients had a favorable outcome, and the mortality was 29%. Primary DC appeared to have lower in-hospital mortality and have better outcome. Adjusting for age and admission GCS, primary DC was not significantly associated with decreased mortality and improved outcomes.